SQL Server is a relational database management system (RDBMS) by Microsoft. "Teradata's licensing is on the expensive side."."The price of Teradata could be less expensive.".It's the Ferrari of databases for data warehousing." If you're looking for an inexpensive solution to run a database, this isn't your tool. However, what they deliver they are outstanding. On a scale of one to five, with one being the worst and five being the best, I'm giving Teradata a three, because it can be a little expensive, when compared to other solutions." "Teradata pricing is fine, and it's competitive with all the legacy models."The cost of running Teradata is quite high, but you get a good return on investment.".They've added pay-as-you-go and cloud models, so it's changing, but Teradata is generally known as an expensive high-end product." However, there have been some changes, and Teradata is now offering more flexible pricing models and equipment leasing. "Teradata is expensive, so it's typically marketed to big customers."The price of the solution could be reduced, it is expensive."."The price of Teradata is on the higher side, and I think that it where they lose out on some of their business.".Teradata users report their support as good to excellent.Ĭomparison Results: Because Teradata is more expensive, has harder initial setup, harder scalability, and fewer features, SQL Server ultimately wins out in this comparison. Service and Support: SQL Server users report excellent, responsive support from Microsoft support.ROI: Users of both solutions mention significant ROI.Some mention that the high price is a turn-off while others note that the price is reasonable given its functionality. Some Teradata users note that the solution is high-end and therefore expensive. Pricing: Most SQL Server users mention the price as being reasonable (and less expensive than Oracle).Some users mention that the product should be improved to allow for easier configurations. Teradata users say they’re impressed with the solution's data warehousing, functionality, and flexibility. Some note that they would like the solution to improve their backups and datatypes. SQL Server users note being particularly satisfied with its ease of use, ability to connect with any language, and reporting services. Features: Users of both products are generally happy with their stability and scalability, with a few mentioning that Teradata has issues with scalability when dealing with their on-premises solution.Teradata users mostly note the difficulty and complexity in its initial setup. Ease of Deployment: SQL Server users feel its initial setup is mostly straightforward with some complexity.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between SQL Server and Teradata based on our users’ reviews in five categories.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |